Module 08 · Learning path

Design to code

Align names, properties, tests, documentation, and releases across tools without forcing false parity.

Learning outcome

What this module should change

You will be able to trace a design decision from source through tokens and component APIs to rendered behavior and verification.

Module guide

Four decisions to understand

01

Shared concepts

Design and code should agree on purpose, allowed choices, state, and outcomes even when tool constraints produce different APIs.

Practice

Create a mapping table for one component’s Figma properties, code props, DOM output, and test cases.

02

Tokens in production

Token pipelines transform governed decisions into platform formats while preserving references and modes.

Practice

Trace one semantic token through source, transformation, package, CSS or native output, and component use.

03

Documentation and examples

A useful example declares its assumptions, expected behavior, edge cases, and implementation status.

Practice

Add loading, error, localization, and keyboard examples to a happy-path story.

04

Testing and releases

Visual, interaction, accessibility, and contract tests protect different parts of the system promise.

Practice

Classify a recent regression by the missing test and the missing release signal.

Explanation

Working principles

Parity is conceptual

Figma, React, SwiftUI, and Android views should share intent and supported states, not necessarily identical property surfaces.

Generated is not governed

Automation distributes decisions; review, versioning, ownership, and tests make them trustworthy.

The rendered output is the contract

Names and tokens matter because of the semantics, behavior, resilience, and appearance users finally receive.

Saved in this browser

Practice and check your understanding

0/4 lessons reviewed
What kind of parity matters most across Figma and code?

Explore next

Connect the model to practice